Showing posts with label copyright registration application. Show all posts
Showing posts with label copyright registration application. Show all posts

Thursday, 13 February 2020

Biopic on APJ Abdul Kalam Entered Copyright Dispute


copyright infringement

With the recent release of the first look of APJ Abdul Kalam’s biopic, helmed by Jagadeesh Daneti in association with Hollywood stunt choreographer Johnny Martin, the biopic on the late president’s life run into a Copyright storm. The issue broke out this week when the first look for Jagadeesh Daneti’s biographical film on Dr. Kalam was unveiled (announced) and made official by the Union Information and Broadcasting Minister Prakash Javadekar.

Following Daneti’s announcement, Abhishek Aggarwal on social media claimed that ‘all the rights’ to make a biopic on the former president lie with him. He had obtained all the needed permissions from Kalam Ji’s family itself. He wrote that as a vital part of their next project, i.e., the biopic on Dr. Abdul Kalam, they own all the necessary and official rights even for making films, documentaries, and posters associated with his life in any language.

Aggarwal also stated that Dr. Abdul Kalam Foundation has officially provided the production house with the rights required for making the biopic. What the Abdul Kalam Foundation officially tweeted? It has tweeted ‘Given rights to @AbhishekOfficl of @AAArtsOfficl for making a biopic of @APJAbdulKalam. He has obtained all the official rights for making film or documentary or even posters related to Kalam Ji’s life in all languages, and taking references of such data Acts will be strictly dealt according to the law.’

According to Aggarwal, an official tweet is not less enough to prove that they have the rights for the biopic in all languages, he added.

On the other side, Daneti disputed Aggarwal’s claim by saying that he doesn’t comprehend the concept of rights as Dr.Kalam is such an inspiring personality that anyone can make a biopic on him.

Two Telugu filmmakers – Abhishek Aggarwal and Jagadeesh Daneti seem to be at loggerheads over this matter. They both claimed copyright on making a biopic on the former president of India. Reports showed that while the first look for Jagadeesh’s film was unveiled recently, Abhishek had announced his film in May 2019. However, both the filmmakers have kept their points, but who would win the battle is yet to be seen. For more visit: https://www.kashishipr.com/ 

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:




Contact - US

Thursday, 9 January 2020

Chhapaak Director Meghna Responds to Copyright Claims by Writer Rakesh Bharti


Chhapaak Director Meghna Responds to Copyright Claims by Writer Rakesh Bharti

Director of the movie Chhapaak Meghna Gulzar has recently filed an affidavit against writer Rakesh Bharti in response to copyright violation charges. In her response filed before Bombay High Court (HC), she said that copyright couldn’t be claimed on true events and sought dismissal of the lawsuit seeking a stay on Chhapaak’s release scheduled to be held on January 10, 2020.

Writer RakeshBharti had filed a Copyright Infringement lawsuit against director Meghna Gulzar and actress Deepika Padukone in association with their upcoming film Chhapaak in which the actress plays the role of an acid attack survivor. Based on the story of the life of an acid attack survivor named LaxmiAgarwal, the said film revolves around Malti and her struggle not just to find justice but also for self-acceptance, courage, and love for life after a 32-year-old man poured acid on her face for rejecting his proposal when she was just 15.

Rakesh claimed that he, along with his son, had acquired rights to bring the real-life story of an acid attack survivor on the celluloid and that they had registered their film with the name Black Day in 2015. He added that they had shared a copy of their script with executives at Ka productions, Mriga Films, and Fox Star Studio, but found that the makers were already planning for the film separately. He also alleged that they finally wrote to the director in the year 2017, but she didn’t reply. It’s the said copyright violation allegation in response to which the director has filed an affidavit against the writer at the Bombay High Court.

The affidavit filed by the director through NaikNaik and Company stated that the lawsuit filed by RakeshBharti is ‘wholly misconceived, frivolous, legally untenable, and unmeritorious.’ In detail, it stated that:
·         The writer has failed to place any detail on record, which can explain that the suit film is infringing upon or imitation of the suit work.
·         The details of pre-production and post-production activities related to the film are in the public domain since February 2017, and the suit film has been publicized widely through digital platforms and print media. Hence, it is inconceivable that the petitioner (writer) was unaware of the fact that the defendant (director) was planning or planned to produce the suit film.
Furthermore, Gulzar, in her affidavit, asserted that Copyright Protection could not be extended to facts available in the public domain and events, which have factually transpired. The affidavit also pointed out that the suit didn’t specify how the story of the writer’s film and Chhapaak movie was the same.
Meanwhile, the movie Chhapaak slated to release on January 10 is just a few days away from hitting the screens, the result of the hearing associated with matter is yet to come. For more visit: https://www.kashishipr.com/ 

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:




Contact - US

Wednesday, 8 January 2020

How to Defend Against Copyright Infringement Claims by Copyright Trolls?

copyright infringement

Under Copyright Law, all those who participate in displaying or distributing the unauthorized copy of a copyrighted work is liable to infringement. With this rule, and the ease to copy things online, and increasingly, the ease of finding such copies, the vulnerabilities to get hit by copyright trolls have increased manifold.

Copyright Troll
It is a term used to represent copyright owners who threaten litigation over the use of their copyrighted content to extract extreme license fees. The tactic, in common, is based on provisions for awards of Intellectual Property (IP) Attorneys‘ fees and statutory damages to successful plaintiffs in the copyright infringement lawsuit, which can result in damages many times higher than the typical license fees. In general, the step-wise process of copyright trolling includes finding the copyrighted content online, sending license fee demands, and then processing payments. Note that although the allegations of infringement and demands for fees by copyright trolls are invalid in many cases, still ignoring them isn’t safe at all. As many reports show that almost every business with a website is vulnerable to copyright trolling, it is crucial to deal with the demands from copyright trolls promptly and appropriately.
More important, website owners and internet surfers should take measures to keep themselves away from Copyright Infringement claims in the first place. Here’re the steps that can help them in doing so.

Steps to Avoid Being Hit by Copyright Trolls
1.     Never Assume That Any Content Online Is Free to Use
A commonly held but false assumption is that the content found online is available for everyone to use. Nonetheless, the reality is a bit different. In reality, almost all content online is protected under copyright rights, and therefore, one who wants to use it always need permission to do so. It is true for all users, whether they are using the content for commercial business or as a non-profit entity. Although the copyright owners charge comparatively lesser license fees to non-profits than commercial businesses, they are entitled to demand compensation for their work’s unauthorized use from all users.
2.     Don’t Assume That Your Unauthorized Use Would Qualify As Fair Use
The concept of Fair Use doesn’t correlate to the normal concept of what is fair. Moreover, the rules for what will qualify are not easy. While the fair use concept can apply to certain educational, editorial, and non-commercial use, it doesn’t mean that any non-profit or educational entity is free to use copyrighted works without the owners’ consent. Nor does it mean that giving credit to the owners will excuse the unauthorized use.  Fair use, in actual, is one of the difficult legal doctrines that demands looking at several factors to stay safe. Hence, if you are planning to go for Fair Use, be meticulous and proceed only after having precise information and under the supervision of deft IP lawyers.
3.     Get Permission from the Copyright Owner
If you want to use any photo available online, then it is better to utilize the information provided with the search results to find and contact the copyright owner who can grant permission to use that photo. Generally, it is the safest way to use a preferred image without facing issues. Adobe Stock, Getty Images, and Shutterstock are some of the reputable stock agencies that allow you to obtain creative content for various levels of licensing.
4.     Ensure Having Appropriate Contracts With Your Designer
If you are looking to get your site designed by a designer, don’t forget to have written contracts with him/her. The contract should include info that he/she has obtained permission for the use of any third-party content. It must also include a provision that you are not liable to any claim if the content used by the designer infringes upon anyone’s IP.
5.     Do not Ignore A Copyright Troll Demand
People often ignore the copyright troll demand, but it is not at all a good idea. Doing so can be dangerous. Hence, rather than ignoring the notice from copyright troll, you should take it seriously. On the other side, it would not be wise to pay the asserted fee without making efforts to know whether the claim is valid. Actually, in most cases, the claims are invalid, and even if they are valid, then the demanded fee may not be reasonable.
Therefore, before stepping ahead, you are recommended to evaluate the situation and determine the best strategy to respond to the demand you received from the copyright troll. As per many reports, finding an experienced lawyer who deals in Copyright Registration ProcessesCopyright Infringement lawsuits, etc., is an excellent way to handle such situations. With a prompt rebuttal under the supervision of an adept copyright solicitor, you can get the claim removed or the monetary demand reduced. For more visit: https://www.kashishipr.com/ 

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:




Contact - US

Wednesday, 18 December 2019

Bombay HC Rules Against Google and YouTube in Copyright Infringement Case

copyright registration application

The Bombay High Court (HC) has recently ruled in favor of an Indian filmmaker named Sunil Darshan and against Google and YouTube. With the recent decision awarding damages of Rs 50000 ($700) to the plaintiff, the eight-year-long Copyright Infringement battle came to a temporary end. Although the compensation of this much amount may appear as a joke for someone who has put up a legal battle against a tech giant for several years, its value is symbolic and creates a judiciary precedent that could lead to concerning troubles to YouTube.
The Bollywood filmmaker, Sunil Darshan, filed the lawsuit accusing YouTube of violating his copyrights back in the year 2011. He was fed up with YouTube’s ignorance to remove videos of films that were his copyrighted work, and found the Content-ID reporting system to be highly inadequate.
Besides this, Mr. Darshan said that he intends to file another lawsuit to claim the complete damages that he sustained over these years.
Intended to defend itself, YouTube argued that it could not be held directly liable as it is the users (not YouTube) who upload the content (video) on this platform merely acting as an intermediary. The platform likewise claimed that the filmmaker hadn’t used its DMCA takedown tools. So it never received any report from him.
Since this argument by YouTube hasn’t been defined with certainty, the Indian Court ruled that YouTube and Google should not wait for the reception of DMCA takedown notices from the rights holders as they are aware that the content was protected under copyright. The awareness is based on the aspect that the titles of the videos infringing on copyrights were very revealing.
The Court also agreed that the tech giant made a noticeable profit by keeping the copyright-infringing content, indulging in unauthorized exploitation online. Well, this is confirmed by the fact informing that the copyright-infringing videos on this platform weren’t demonetized, but rather, the revenues obtained were split amid YouTube and the uploaders.
As this means that all the responsibilities to recognize the copyright-protected content or work and then remove the same immediately is placed on Google and YouTube, these two giants experienced a hard time to overturn this. Undoubtedly, that’s the case with the existing EU (European) law, but to come across similar grounds in India is something completely new for the tech giant. With all that said, Google is almost surely going to submit an appeal to the verdict by HC as otherwise, it would soon have to reform nearly everything related to the way it operates. For more visit: https://www.kashishipr.com/ 

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:










Contact - US